Review Roundup: James Gunn’s Superman

Critics respond to the latest cinematic incarnation of the Man of Steel.
Superman - James Gunn
The Man of Steel returns

Superman is arguably the most iconic superhero. But it could be argued that the Man of Steel’s cinematic legacy is not so super. There was, of course, Christopher Reeve’s iconic performance in Richard Donner’s Superman (1978), which was followed by several uneven sequels. Brandon Routh took up the cape for 2006’s underwhelming Superman Returns, followed by Henry Cavill in Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel (2013), which offered a “grimdark” take on the hero.

That brings us to director James Gunn and lead actor David Corenswet for 2025’s Superman. Gunn is certainly no stranger to blockbuster superhero movies, having directed the Guardians of the Galaxy films for Marvel. And for his take on the Big Blue Boy Scout, he’s drawn inspiration from Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely’s All-Star Superman, widely acclaimed as one of the definitive Superman comics — and one that’s definitely at odds with Zack Snyder’s divisive interpretation of the character.

So does Gunn and Coreswet’s Superman do right by the the Man of Tomorrow, as he battles Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult), defends Metropolis from all manner of monstrous creatures, and even plays with his dog Krypto? Read on for a collection of critics’ reactions and reviews.


Peter Bradshaw, Cluttered, pointless franchise restarter”

What is the point of a film so stymied in its digitally encoded and generically prescribed world that it can’t even go through the motions, as that would imply some level of activity and signs of life? How many more superhero films in general, and Superman films in particular, do we need to see that all end with the same spectacular faux-apocalypse in the big city with CGI skyscrapers collapsing? They were fun at first… but the thrill is gone.

Hoai-Tran Bui, The most comic book movie ever — for better and for worse”

From the very first frame of the wildly colorful and tooth-achingly earnest comic book epic, it’s clear that Gunn’s love for Superman is so abundant that it threatens to overflow. It shows in the niche Easter eggs (hypno-glasses! robots!) that are littered throughout the movie. It shows in the alarmingly large ensemble, which includes no less than four other superheroes and a handful of worldbuilding cameos, in addition to the regular Superman supporting players. It shows in the surprising amount of emotional heft that Gunn gives every scene with Krypto, the super-dog that had never previously been depicted on the big screen for fear of being too cheesy a concept. But most importantly, it shows in how nakedly earnest the movie is.

Walter Chaw, Superman is the angel of our best nature”

Superman, for me, is the superhero we should most want to be. I’m not talking about the superpowers, I’m talking about being a decent person who genuinely cares about others. He’s also the one I most wished were real — who, although he had unimaginable advantages, still cared about me.

Jake Cole, James Gunn pledges winning allegiance to a superhero’s essential goodness”

Gunn embraces this unabashedly corny optimism with ample humor that never slides into the self-conscious sarcasm that has weighed down so many Marvel movies. This is Superman as he should be: the Big Blue Boy Scout who sticks out like a sore thumb as much for his embodiment of a Rockwellian sentimentality as his alien origin. After so many clumsy efforts to transplant the character to the modern era, this Superman finally admits that the character has been a mainstay for nearly a century precisely because he stands for things outside of faddish trends.

Owen Gleiberman, Winning enough to channel the spirit of the comics”

Superman, however, is also dedicated to treating the Man of Steel as what he was in the comics and the first two Christopher Reeve films: a majestic force of good, yet one who’s stalwart but vulnerable, superhuman but touchingly humane, alive with internal struggle. The new movie isn’t “dark” (Zack Snyder’s ambitious mistake) so much as it’s a loopy, spinning, multifaceted story with genuine emotional stakes. It truly feels like a comic book come to life, which is one reason it treats Superman’s powers as the most spectacular and least interesting thing about him.

Jesse Hassenger, Builds a more vulnerable (and sillier) Superman”

This is a Superman movie that favors sci-fi weirdness and slapstick over lugubrious exposition; it’s nearly as kid-friendly as the ’90s Superman: The Animated Series. There’s even a major plot point about Superman’s Kryptonian parents that could have easily fit on the cover of a Silver Age comic teasing a character-defying revelation. An exclamation of “This is not an imaginary story!” would not be out of place. The movie’s humor and sweetness offer plenty for comics-friendly adults, too, provided they haven’t taken a flying leap off the superhero train.

Jarrod Jones, Supercharges a beleaguered genre”

When fear, anger, and cynicism feel like the default, a superhero movie that presents its splash-page havoc with guileless warmth and zero irony is a rare and precious thing. Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man swung into theaters in 2002, setting a gold standard for superhero movies while thrilling post-9/11 audiences burdened by imminent war. Now, like a bolt from the blue comes James Gunn’s Superman, a rowdy and vivid film that knocks the doldrums out of the beleaguered superhero genre with the kind of two-fisted brio any self-respecting comic hero deserves — and it arrives not a moment too soon.

Josh Larsen, Callous and cruel”

Gunn’s strategic decision to begin this Superman installment in media res is a smart one, given how many iterations we’ve already had, but the movie still lacks the emotional and character context necessary to make us feel as if any of this is worth our investment.

Germain Lussier, Superman Soars”

It takes mere seconds for James Gunn’s Superman to cast a spell on its audience. The film is not just an introduction to a brand-new Superman but to an entire new DC Universe, and with a very clever, very exciting, very intense collection of sentences that appear on screen, it’s instantly clear how different and resonant this film is about to be. The information sets the tone, stage, and stakes in moments, as each statement reverberates with intensity and anticipation. And that’s just the first 60 seconds.

Rodrigo Perez, An overstuffed, cartoonish story”

Attempting to appear original and singular, the film is never actually idiosyncratic, presumes the audience knows everything without explaining much, and moreover, the anthemic emotional notes the movie tries to ascend to never ever soar or safely land with any significant resonance. Superman is desperate to look and feel momentous without ever really actually being monumental.

Nick Schager, Cinema kryptonite strikes again”

Zipping this way and that, Superman gets tangled up in fanciful nonsense that soon renders the entire affair superficial and silly. Similar to Snyder and Joss Whedon’s misshapen Justice League, Gunn’s spectacular overpopulates itself with heroes and villains it has neither the time nor the inclination to develop. Consequently, everyone and everything is two-dimensional, no matter that the director’s imagery is sharp and vibrant.

Alissa Wilkinson, Gunn’s charming take on the Superman myth succeeds”

It’s a sincere but also goofy movie, with a few well-timed twists on the mythology and a couple of added characters (I won’t spoil it, I promise) who keep things light at just the right moments. Our new Superman/Clark Kent, David Corenswet, has muscular shoulders, a dimple in his cheek and a curl in the middle of his forehead, and most important, you believe him when he says he just loves people. He’s channeling a touch of the idealism of, say, the character Jimmy Stewart plays in Frank Capra’s 1939 film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, targeted for his rightdoing by self-interested powerful criminals but also unironically tearing up at idealistic displays of patriotism.


Superman flies into theaters on July 11, 2025. Watch the trailer below.

Enjoy reading Opus? Want to support my writing? Become a subscriber for just $5/month or $50/year.
Subscribe Today
Return to the Opus homepage